Vault
Upgrade to Vault 1.14.x
The Vault 1.14.x upgrade guide contains information on deprecations, important or breaking changes, and remediation recommendations for anyone upgrading from Vault 1.13. Please read carefully.
Feature deprecations and EOL
Duplicative Docker images
As of Vault 1.14 we will no longer update the the vault
Docker image.
Only the Verified Publisher
hashicorp/vault
image will be updated on DockerHub.
Users of Official Images need to use
docker pull hashicorp/vault:<version>
instead of docker pull vault:<version>
to get newer versions of Vault in Docker images. Currently, HashiCorp publishes
and updates identical Docker images of Vault as Verified Publisher and
Official images separately.
Important changes
vault.raft_storage.bolt.write.time
has been corrected from a summary to a counter to more accurately reflect that it
is measuring cumulative time writing, and not the distribution of individual write times.
Application of Sentinel Role Governing Policies (RGPs) via identity groups
As of versions 1.15.0
, 1.14.4
, and 1.13.8
, the Sentinel RGPSs derived from membership in identity groups apply
only to entities in the same and child namespaces, relative to the identity group.
Also, the group_policy_application_mode
only applies to
to ACL policies. Vault Sentinel Role Governing Policies (RGPs) are not affected by group policy application mode.
Activity Log Changes
Disable client counting activity
License utilization cannot be reported if client counting is disabled.
As of Vault Enterprise 1.14.10 and later, client counting cannot be disabled using /sys/internal/counters/config
endpoint as manual license utilization reporting is always enabled.
As of Vault Enterprise 1.14.0 and later, client counting cannot be disabled using /sys/internal/counters/config
endpoint when automated license utilization reporting is enabled.
Known issues and workarounds
Users limited by control groups can only access issuer detail from PKI overview page
Affected versions
- Vault 1.14.x
Issue
Vault UI users who require control group approval to read issuer details are directed to the Control Group Access page when they try to view issuer details from links on the Issuer list page.
Workaround
Vault UI users constrained by control groups should select issuers from the PKI overview page to view detailed information instead of the Issuers list page.
API calls to update-primary may lead to data loss
Affected versions
All versions of Vault before 1.14.1, 1.13.5, 1.12.9, and 1.11.12.
Issue
The update-primary endpoint temporarily removes all mount entries except for those that are managed automatically by vault (e.g. identity mounts). In certain situations, a race condition between mount table truncation replication repairs may lead to data loss when updating secondary replication clusters.
Situations where the race condition may occur:
- When the cluster has local data (e.g., PKI certificates, app role secret IDs)
in shared mounts.
Calling
update-primary
on a performance secondary with local data in shared mounts may corrupt the merkle tree on the secondary. The secondary still contains all the previously stored data, but the corruption means that downstream secondaries will not receive the shared data and will interpret the update as a request to delete the information. If the downstream secondary is promoted before the merkle tree is repaired, the newly promoted secondary will not contain the expected local data. The missing data may be unrecoverable if the original secondary is is lost or destroyed. - When the cluster has an
Allow
paths defined. As of Vault 1.0.3.1, startup, unseal, and callingupdate-primary
all trigger a background job that looks at the current mount data and removes invalid entries based on path filters. When a secondary hasAllow
path filters, the cleanup code may misfire in the windown of time after update-primary truncats the mount tables but before the mount tables are rewritten by replication. The cleanup code deletes data associated with the missing mount entries but does not modify the merkle tree. Because the merkle tree remains unchanged, replication will not know that the data is missing and needs to be repaired.
Workaround 1: PR secondary with local data in shared mounts
Watch for cleaning key in merkle tree
in the TRACE log immediately after an
update-primary call on a PR secondary to indicate the merkle tree may be
corrupt. Repair the merkle tree by issuing a
replication reindex request
to the PR secondary.
If TRACE logs are no longer available, we recommend pre-emptively reindexing the PR secondary as a precaution.
Workaround 2: PR secondary with "Allow" path filters
Watch for deleted mistakenly stored mount entry from backend
in the INFO log.
Reindex the performance secondary to update the merkle tree with the missing
data and allow replication to disseminate the changes. You will not be able to
recover local data on shared mounts (e.g., PKI certificates).
If INFO logs are no longer available, query the shared mount in question to confirm whether your role and configuration data are present on the primary but missing from the secondary.
Using 'update_primary_addrs' on a demoted cluster causes Vault to panic
Affected versions
- 1.13.3, 1.13.4 & 1.14.0
Issue
If the update_primary_addrs
parameter is used on a recently demoted cluster, Vault will panic due to no longer
having information about the primary cluster.
Workaround
Instead of using update_primary_addrs
on the recently demoted cluster, instead provide an
activation token.
Safari login screen appears broken on the UI
Affected versions
- 1.14.0
Issue
The login screen on Safari appears to be broken, presenting as a blank white screen.
Workaround
Scroll down to find the login section.
AWS static roles ignore changes to rotation period
Affected versions
- 1.14.0+
Issue
AWS static roles currently ignore configuration changes made to the key rotation period. As a result, Vault will continue to use whatever rotation period was set when the roles were originally created.
Workaround
Delete and recreate any static role objects that should use the new rotation period.
Transit Encryption with Cloud KMS managed keys causes a panic
Affected versions
- 1.13.1+ up to 1.13.8 inclusively
- 1.14.0+ up to 1.14.4 inclusively
- 1.15.0
Issue
Vault panics when it receives a Transit encryption API call that is backed by a Cloud KMS managed key (Azure, GCP, AWS).
Note
The issue does not affect encryption and decryption with the following key types:- PKCS#11 managed keys
- Transit native keys
Workaround
None at this time
Transit Sign API calls with managed keys fail
Affected versions
- 1.14.0+ up to 1.14.4 inclusively
- 1.15.0
Issue
Vault responds to Transit sign API calls with the following error when the request uses a managed key:
requested version for signing does not contain a private part
Note
The issue does not affect signing with the following key types:- Transit native keys
Workaround
None at this time
Collapsed navbar does not allow you to click inside the console or namespace picker
Affected versions
The UI issue affects Vault versions 1.14.0+ and 1.15.0+. A fix is expected for Vault 1.16.0.
Issue
The Vauil UI currently uses a version of HDS that does not allow users to click within collapsed elements. In particular, the dev console or namespace picker become inaccessible when viewing the components in smaller viewports.
Workaround
Expand the width of the screen until you deactivate the collapsed view. Once the full navbar is displayed, click the desired components.
User lockout potential double logging
Affected versions
- 1.14.5
Issue
A logging enhancement released before we intended in 1.14.5. In some cases, additional logging does not trigger or generate double logs.
Internal error when vault policy in namespace does not exist
If a user is a member of a group that gets a policy from a namespace other than the one they’re trying to log into, and that policy doesn’t exist, Vault returns an internal error. This impacts all auth methods.
Affected versions
- 1.13.8 and 1.13.9
- 1.14.4 and 1.14.5
- 1.15.0 and 1.15.1
A fix has been released in Vault 1.13.10, 1.14.6, and 1.15.2.
Workaround
During authentication, Vault derives inherited policies based on the groups an entity belongs to. Vault returns an internal error when attaching the derived policy to a token when:
- the token belongs to a different namespace than the one handling authentication, and
- the derived policy does not exist under the namespace.
You can resolve the error by adding the policy to the relevant namespace or deleting the group policy mapping that uses the derived policy.
As an example, consider the following userpass auth method failure. The error is due to the fact that Vault expects a group policy under the namespace that does not exist.
# Failed login
$ vault login -method=userpass username=user1 password=123
Error authenticating: Error making API request.
URL: PUT http://127.0.0.1:8200/v1/auth/userpass/login/user1
Code: 500. Errors:
* internal error
To confirm the problem is a missing policy, start by identifying the relevant entity and group IDs:
$ vault read -format=json identity/entity/name/user1 | \
jq '{"entity_id": .data.id, "group_ids": .data.group_ids} '
{
"entity_id": "420c82de-57c3-df2e-2ef6-0690073b1636",
"group_ids": [
"6cb152b7-955d-272b-4dcf-a2ed668ca1ea"
]
}
Use the group ID to fetch the relevant policies for the group under the ns1
namespace:
$ vault read -format=json -namespace=ns1 \
identity/group/id/6cb152b7-955d-272b-4dcf-a2ed668ca1ea | \
jq '.data.policies'
[
"group_policy"
]
Now that we know Vault is looking for a policy called group_policy
, we can
check whether that policy exists under the ns1
namespace:
$ vault policy list -namespace=ns1
default
The only policy in the ns1
namespace is default
, which confirms that the
missing policy (group_policy
) is causing the error.
To fix the problem, we can either remove the missing policy from the
6cb152b7-955d-272b-4dcf-a2ed668ca1ea
group or create the missing policy under
the ns1
namespace.
To remove group_policy
from group ID 6cb152b7-955d-272b-4dcf-a2ed668ca1ea
,
use the vault write
command to set the applicable policies to just include
default
:
$ vault write \
-namespace=ns1 \
identity/group/id/6cb152b7-955d-272b-4dcf-a2ed668ca1ea \
name="test" \
policies="default"
Verify the fix by re-running the login command:
$ vault login -method=userpass username=user1 password=123
Vault is storing references to ephemeral sub-loggers leading to unbounded memory consumption
Affected versions
This memory consumption bug affects Vault Community and Enterprise versions:
- 1.13.7 - 1.13.9
- 1.14.3 - 1.14.5
- 1.15.0 - 1.15.1
This change that introduced this bug has been reverted as of 1.13.10, 1.14.6, and 1.15.2
Issue
Vault is unexpectedly storing references to ephemeral sub-loggers which prevents them from being cleaned up, leading to unbound memory consumption for loggers. This came about from a change to address a previously known issue around sub-logger levels not being adjusted on reload. This impacts many areas of Vault, but primarily logins in Enterprise.
Workaround
There is no workaround.
Sublogger levels not adjusted on reload
Affected versions
This issue affects all Vault Community and Vault Enterprise versions.
Issue
Vault does not honor a modified log_level
configuration for certain subsystem
loggers on SIGHUP.
The issue is known to specifically affect resolver.watcher
and
replication.index.*
subloggers.
After modifying the log_level
and issuing a reload (SIGHUP), some loggers are
updated to reflect the new configuration, while some subsystem logger levels
remain unchanged.
For example, after starting a server with log_level: "trace"
and modifying it
to log_level: "info"
the following lines appear after reload:
[TRACE] resolver.watcher: dr mode doesn't have failover support, returning
...
[DEBUG] replication.index.perf: saved checkpoint: num_dirty=5
[DEBUG] replication.index.local: saved checkpoint: num_dirty=0
[DEBUG] replication.index.periodic: starting WAL GC: from=2531280 to=2531280 last=2531536
Workaround
The workaround is to restart the Vault server.
Fatal error during expiration metrics gathering causing Vault crash
Affected versions
This issue affects Vault Community and Enterprise versions:
- 1.13.9
- 1.14.5
- 1.15.1
A fix has been issued in Vault 1.13.10, 1.14.6, and 1.15.2.
Issue
A recent change to Vault to improve state change speed (e.g. becoming active or standby) introduced a concurrency issue which can lead to a concurrent iteration and write on a map, causing a fatal error and crashing Vault. This error occurs when gathering lease and token metrics from the expiration manager. These metrics originate from the active node in a HA cluster, as such a standby node will take over active duties and the cluster will remain functional should the original active node encounter this bug. The new active node will be vulnerable to the same bug, but may not encounter it immediately.
There is no workaround.
Deadlock can occur on performance secondary clusters with many mounts
Affected versions
- 1.15.0 - 1.15.5
- 1.14.5 - 1.14.9
- 1.13.9 - 1.13.13
Issue
Vault 1.15.0, 1.14.5, and 1.13.9 introduced a worker pool to schedule periodic rollback operations on all mounts. This worker pool defaulted to using 256 workers. The worker pool introduced a risk of deadlocking on the active node of performance secondary clusters, leaving that cluster unable to service any requests.
The conditions required to cause the deadlock on the performance secondary:
- Performance replication is enabled
- The performance primary cluster has more than 256 non-local mounts. The more mounts the cluster has, the more likely the deadlock becomes
- One of the following occurs:
- A replicated mount is unmounted or remounted OR
- A replicated namespace is deleted OR
- Replication paths filters are used to filter at least one mount or namespace
Workaround
Set the VAULT_ROLLBACK_WORKERS
environment variable to a number larger than
the number of mounts in your Vault cluster and restart Vault:
$ export VAULT_ROLLBACK_WORKERS=1000
PKI OCSP GET requests can return HTTP redirect responses
If a base64 encoded OCSP request contains consecutive '/' characters, the GET request will return a 301 permanent redirect response. If the redirection is followed, the request will not decode as it will not be a properly base64 encoded request.
As a workaround, OCSP POST requests can be used which are unaffected.
Impacted versions
Affects all current versions of 1.12.x, 1.13.x, 1.14.x, 1.15.x, 1.16.x, 1.17.x.
Performance Standbys revert to Standby mode on unseal
Affected versions
- 1.14.12
- 1.15.8
- 1.16.2
Issue
If you previously set a value for retention_months
via the
sys/internal/counters/config
endpoint, upgrading to Vault Enterprise versions 1.14.12, 1.15.8, and 1.16.2
will cause Performance Standby
nodes to revert to Standby mode.
Adding nodes with Vault Enterprise versions 1.14.12, 1.15.8, or 1.16.2 to a
cluster with an older versioned leader will see any previously set
retention_months
value and attempt to write the new minimum value of 48
. The
storage write will result in a read-only error:
[ERROR] core: performance standby post-unseal setup failed: error="cannot write to readonly storage"
You can verify the status of your nodes by checking the /sys/health endpoint.
Deployments that rely on scaling across Performance Standbys will now forward all requests to the active node, increasing the utilization of the active node.
Post-upgrade cluster membership
During the last step of a full upgrade, the old leader steps down, causing one of the Standby nodes to become leader.A fix for the read-only storage error has been prioritized and escalated. The fix will be in releases 1.14.13, 1.15.9 and 1.16.3.
Important
If you have already upgraded to versions 1.14.12, 1.15.8, or 1.16.2, please refer to the workaround section for options.Workaround
Once the leader of the cluster has been updgraded to version 1.14.12, 1.15.8, or
1.16.2, the workaround is to update the retention_months
value on the active
node via the
sys/internal/counters/config
endpoint:
$ vault write sys/internal/counters/config retention_months=48
This storage entry will be written to all nodes in the cluster, allowing them to immediately unseal as Performance Standbys.
After the new retention_months
value is written to storage on the active node,
adding new nodes to the cluster will not cause the read-only error.
Sending SIGHUP to vault standby node causes panic
Affected versions
- 1.13.4+
- 1.14.0+
- 1.15.0+
- 1.16.0+
Issue
Sending a SIGHUP to a vault standby node running an enterprise build can cause a panic if there is a change to the license, or reporting configuration. Active and performance standby nodes will perform fine. It is recommended that operators stop and restart vault nodes individually if configuration changes are required.
Workaround
Instead of issuing a SIGHUP, users should stop individual vault nodes, update the configuration or license and then restart the node.